7X Parts for sale
I have a 7X block (no serial number) and does not appear to have been milled on the intake & exhaust ports. Letters still on the valve cover ledge.
and 7X exhaust manifold that has been blasted and jet coated. $2900.00
Can machine prepare for assembly--your option for additional $. Pickup or will ship. Shipping additional charge. Now is your chance for a correct 7X motor.
Randy Maas
309-267-6158
and 7X exhaust manifold that has been blasted and jet coated. $2900.00
Can machine prepare for assembly--your option for additional $. Pickup or will ship. Shipping additional charge. Now is your chance for a correct 7X motor.
Randy Maas
309-267-6158
0
Comments
-
maasfh wrote:I have a 7X block (no serial number) and does not appear to have been milled on the intake & exhaust ports. Letters still on the valve cover ledge.
and 7X exhaust manifold that has been blasted and jet coated. $2900.00
Can machine prepare for assembly--your option for additional $. Pickup or will ship. Shipping additional charge. Now is your chance for a correct 7X motor.
Randy Maas
309-267-61580 -
walt's garage-53 wrote:All replacement engines in 1956 engines were 7x blocks. 30 over bore, 10 under rods and mains. The dealers when replacing an engine were supposed to install the engine number from the engine they replaced, most did not. The letters stamped on the valve cover ledge is the size of the piston in the bore. Marks meant 1 to 5 thousand over size. In this case 30 + 1 to 5. All Hudson engines are marked this way so if a piston had to be replaced you gave them that letter. It's all in the Hudson manuals all years. Walt.
Walt,
Please clarify. What exactly was "replacement engines in 1956 engines"? Are you saying that all '56 blocks were same as 7X? Or was there a specific replacement block for '56 engines that was actually a 7X, and machined for the bigger valves. I've been under the impression, and my '56 block bares this out, that all '56 blocks were essentially 7X blocks without the "finishing" work and larger valves. They have the deep valve reliefs, 1/2" drilled head bolts, improved cooling, and standard twin-H in the Hornet.0 -
dougson wrote:Walt,
Please clarify. What exactly was "replacement engines in 1956 engines"? Are you saying that all '56 blocks were same as 7X? Or was there a specific replacement block for '56 engines that was actually a 7X, and machined for the bigger valves. I've been under the impression, and my '56 block bares this out, that all '56 blocks were essentially 7X blocks without the "finishing" work and larger valves. They have the deep valve reliefs, 1/2" drilled head bolts, improved cooling, and standard twin-H in the Hornet.0 -
The true 7X block had a different relief than the 55/56 blocks. Which make the 7X block unique before 1955/56 block came out.0
-
OK, you got me going here. Can you describe the difference in the relief of a "True 7X" block and a 55-56 block? Photographs? "Deeper" than the approximately 3/16 deep relief of the 55-56 with which I am familiar?
I know that the 232 head used was machined as well and would love to find an original"7X" 232 head to measure along with the block.
Thanks for the help,
Ivan0 -
My dad would need to give you the exact details. I believe he also has an 7X 232 head so he can measure for you the depth.
The hardest thing on a 7x to find is the aluminum twin H manifold. I seen just one. The carbs sit about one inch higher than the cast iron.0 -
Wow, aluminum intake! And Hudson built! :cool: I've heard about it, thought it was only a prototype. How did it attach to the exhaust manifold, there had to be some kind of insulation. It would be interesting to know how many complete 7X "kits" were prepared and sold. I've read somewhere that they were available through '55.0
-
ivanz62 wrote:OK, you got me going here. Can you describe the difference in the relief of a "True 7X" block and a 55-56 block? Photographs? "Deeper" than the approximately 3/16 deep relief of the 55-56 with which I am familiar?
I know that the 232 head used was machined as well and would love to find an original"7X" 232 head to measure along with the block.
Thanks for the help,
Ivan0 -
walt's garage-53 wrote:Ivan, Walt here. There were no 7X blocks from Hudson. All blocks had the same relief. When you ordered a 7X, the stock engine was installed in car and you had the chose to have the Hudson Service Garage or your dealer install the engine and you did not get the engine taken from the car back. I have the bulletin and will bring it with me when I go to Alan's house to install the carb I'm rebuilding for him. Go right past your shop. Walt.
Hi Walt,
Now you have me confused. You state "There were no 7X blocks from Hudson". Then in a following sentence you state "When you ordered a 7X
" Can you clarify? Were there different years you could get one and later years not?
Randy0 -
ivanz62 wrote:OK, you got me going here. Can you describe the difference in the relief of a "True 7X" block and a 55-56 block? Photographs? "Deeper" than the approximately 3/16 deep relief of the 55-56 with which I am familiar?
I know that the 232 head used was machined as well and would love to find an original"7X" 232 head to measure along with the block.
Thanks for the help,
Ivan
Ivan,
Sent you a photo of the 7X relief I have with the block with no serial number
Randy0 -
maasfh wrote:Ivan,
Sent you a photo of the 7X relief I have with the block with no serial number
Randy
Can we see it also? It would be interesting to compare with my '56 block.
And confusion reigns. The 7X, I thought, was cast by Hudson, starting in '52, with the polished deep valve reliefs to provide the highest flow in race engines. I also thought they were machined for the larger valves. I thought valve reliefs were developed as a response to poor mixture flow in stock engines. Valve reliefs appeared in standard blocks from '52 (?) on, at first shallow, increasing in volume until '56. The '54 ad campaign constantly referred to "super induction" (=valve reliefs) allowing "instant action".0 -
maasfh wrote:Hi Walt,
Now you have me confused. You state "There were no 7X blocks from Hudson". Then in a following sentence you state "When you ordered a 7X
" Can you clarify? Were there different years you could get one and later years not?
Randy0 -
Walt,
I have to disagree with you on the content of the block casting. I had metal shavings from both a 1953 and my 1956 308 tested and they both came back as the same alloy material. they were identical to a t in alloy content. the 55 and 56 blocks were cast from the same material as the early engines not regular cast iron.
later,
PaceRacer500 -
walt's garage-53 wrote:The 7X engine had to be installed by the dealer from his stock or you could have the factory send it to a Hudson service garage. That was another add on the selling price. That only last about 6 months and the factory quiet selling 7X engines, not enough demands. Second series 1955 and all 1956 engines were the same. Only the relief was a little different, 1/2" head bolts, 30 overbore and 10 under mains and rods. 1955 and 1956 engines are made of plain cast iron, not chrome nickel alloy as all engines from 1954 down. 1953 and 1954 jets were also only cast iron. Walt.
I was under the impression the severe usage items (I figured 7X block included--maybe wrong) had to be offered to the public in order for the racers to have the severe usage parts for "stock car rac'in". Maybe the racers entered the back door and asked for Bernie.
Randy0 -
Iam confused also, A 52 308 is not the same as a 55 308 . The 52 is made of alloy also you dont have to worry about unleaded fuel as the valves are hard enough to take the no lead fuel right ? Could they have used the same blocks in 55 that were left over. Could you take it for a repower and a shop just put one in, Like say in 1960 Here is a engine for ya here ya go. Anything could happen and did. Just my one cent. John:)0
-
The 1948-1954 AMC factory parts catalog published 11/54 provides stock numbers for 7X blocks (as distinguished from other blocks and so indicated "7X"), heads (iron only), valves etc. Bulletins referring to these parts listed prices. Several kits were available marked "7X". Three cams were available, two marked "7X" one not, although it was listed elsewhere as "high performance". "SU" (severe usage) parts, not part of "7X", were also listed, although the higher volume gas tank (volume not given) is not listed as "SU". All of this information has been posted here before, actually several times. The chief difference between '55 and '56 engines is that in '56 an "improved design" cam was offered as standard and stamped 309742, the same as the so-called '54 "chain stretcher", and hydraulic lifters. Some very late '55s' might have had these lifters.0
-
I just yesterday was tqalking with George Place, and old (88 yars) Hudson mechanic and brought up the Chrome Alloy/Cast Iron question about the '55 & '56 Hudson engines. He said that he had found that all the '55 & '56 engines he had had in his garage were of the same alloy as the earlier '48 thru '54 engines - he thinks they were simply shipped over to Kanosha from the stock of blocks that were "curing out" behind the Jefferson Ave plant in Detroit. This guy had one of the most elaberate machine shops around for engine rebuilding, and just sold out his business this past year. He deffinately knows what he is talking about when it comes to making a Hudson run - splasher or late model, George could make them all go! ! !0
-
This is interesting, a myth has just died.
The conventional Hudson lore is that the 55/56 blocks were cast from a different alloy to the 48 to 54 blocks. I'm not sure where I learned that fact from, but its something I've known for a long time. And now I've learned its never been true!
That PacerRacer50 has actually gone to the trouble of having a metallurgical analysis done on the metal from early and late blocks and proven that they are the same alloy is absolutely brilliant. And thanks for doing that, a little science is preferable to heaps of supposition.
Maybe an article for WTN PacerRacer50?0 -
If I still have the reports I will but they are lost along with my information I had for all the modifications I did to my present engine. Some place in my filing cabinet (the basement) is where they reside.
I had a friend that works for a major diesel engine mfg. here in the state of Indiana get the metallurgical analysis done as a "side project".... if I ever do find these reports I'll make sure that I mark out the names and parties just like Uncle Sam does....
later,
PaceRacer500 -
PaceRacer50 wrote:If I still have the reports I will but they are lost along with my information I had for all the modifications I did to my present engine. Some place in my filing cabinet (the basement) is where they reside.
I had a friend that works for a major diesel engine mfg. here in the state of Indiana get the metallurgical analysis done as a "side project".... if I ever do find these reports I'll make sure that I mark out the names and parties just like Uncle Sam does....
later,
PaceRacer500 -
the 1956 Hudson 308 engine I have did not come out new in a car from the factory. We believe it was bought from J.C. Whitney as a replacement because it was set up with a stepped flywheel for the early transmission, had hydraulic lifters with the 742 cam, intake and exhaust manifold were single 2bbl but with the exhaust manifold flanges just like the early pre 1955 engines.
the serial number stamped in the pad next to the edge of the headgasket surface on the deck is way above any number the guys here in the Hudson club in Indiana has ever seen. The engine was .020 overbore, had .010 rods and mains with this information stamped into one of the ribs in the 262 cylinder head that came with the engine along with the date of Feb of 1964. It was so clean inside that there was no carbon in the combustion chamber of the head at all and the hone in the cylinders was fresh.
The analysis of this cast iron along with a chunk of a 1952 Hudson 308 block I got from a friend from down south took place in the city of Columbus where some of the best diesel engines in the world are made. I did not tell my friends in Columbus what mfg these metal shavings came from but the ones from my engine came from the intake & exhaust ports along with the relief area. The earlier 308 was a chunk of lower block and part of a cylinder that we shaved in the bridgeport. I believe I had close to 3lbs of material from each engine.
They wanted to know just what kind of engine that this material came from as they had never seen a gas engine use an alloy of this nature.
I did not put hardened seats in the 56-308 I am running. the head has been off twice to check things out. Taking accurate measurements of the valves closed there has been no sinking of the seating surface at all. Granted I am not driving on cheep pump gas 200,000 miles but running 118 octane racing fuel with 4-5lbs of boost from the supercharger is putting a large amount of stress on this old 308.
I do know that this block was not cast in Wisconsin as it has the CWC foundry casting logo in the side exactly as the 1952 engine had.
I do not doubt that there has been problems with seats sinking in any of these older engines when run for a lot of miles on the grades of gas we have now. I have seen it in other engines and even engines with hardened seats installed. I believe it depends on how you drive them, how rich or lean they are tuned, how hot they run, ignition advance curve, what type of valves are used on the exhaust side during the rebuilds and a lot of other issues.
I had custom high temperature exhaust valves made for this engine for turbocharged racing engines and used stainless steel intake valves both custom made by Manley. The exhaust valves look like I just took them out of the box and installed them when I had the head off 6 weeks ago. Right now I have 2800 miles with over 1/3 of that at the drag strip on this engine.
All I know is that if this was soft cast iron I ported, polished and relieved and how many carbide cutters (26 to be exact) I went through during the 3-1/2 weeks it took me to do all 12 ports & 6 reliefs I would really hate to port one of these 308 Hornet engines with the Alloy blocks......
later,
PaceRacer500 -
PaceRacer50 wrote:
I do know that this block was not cast in Wisconsin as it has the CWC foundry casting logo in the side exactly as the 1952 engine had.
PaceRacer50
To the panel.
Were all the 55/56 blocks cast at CWC like the early ones were, or were some cast at Wisconsin? If some were cast at Wisconsin, how are they identified?0 -
maasfh wrote:Hi Walt,
Now you have me confused. You state "There were no 7X blocks from Hudson". Then in a following sentence you state "When you ordered a 7X
" Can you clarify? Were there different years you could get one and later years not?
Randy0 -
56 block valve area0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- 37K All Categories
- 106 Hudson 1916 - 1929
- 19 Upcoming Events
- 91 Essex Super 6
- 28.6K HUDSON
- 559 "How To" - Skills, mechanical and other wise
- 993 Street Rods
- 150 American Motors
- 173 The Flathead Forum
- 49 Manuals, etc,.
- 78 Hudson 8
- 44 FORUM - Instructions and Tips on using the forum
- 2.8K CLASSIFIEDS
- 599 Vehicles
- 2.1K Parts & Pieces
- 77 Literature & Memorabilia
- Hudson 1916 - 1929 Yahoo Groups Archived Photos