Hudsons at Barrett-Jackson

Comments

  • hudsontech
    hudsontech Senior Contributor
    Rare bird, that Italia. Since they were all built in 1954 this one has to be one of a kind being a 1955 model.
    At least the prices on the '49's are realistic, more or less.

    Hudsonly,
    Alex Burr
    Memphis, TN
  • Alex I was under the impresion they actualy titled them as 55 models . Not sure where I got that info from or when I heard it. So I cant prove it ,
    Roger
  • hudsontech
    hudsontech Senior Contributor
    According to a Wickpedia article (Hudson Italia) the car was introduced 14 January 1954. The article does state, just before that entry, that it was subsequently marketed by American Motors Corporation during the 1954 and 1955 model years.
    However, the side bar says 1953-1954. Take yer choice. I say they were 1954 models - that's my story and I'm sticking to it until the election results come in - or the fat lady sings. :D

    Hudsonly,
    Alex Burr
    Memphis, TN
  • commodorecollector
    commodorecollector Senior Contributor
    But Alex.... what does "The History of Hudson" say? :P
    Love the 49' Club Coupe
  • oldhudsons
    oldhudsons Senior Contributor
    the '29 dual cowl far more rare than an Italia!
    This is one that John Soneff "handled" a couple of times, I recognize it from the Wyo. plates; it may have been the one Zach Brinkerhoff used to own.
    I believe this car & a Club Sedan (also 139" w.b., bodied by Biddle & Smart like the dual cowl) that John owned at the time were the ones on display at a National in Denver decades ago; they made an incredible pair, parked side by side.
  • Browniepetersen
    Browniepetersen Senior Contributor
    Chris, The History of Hudson shows them first with the 1954 model cars.
  • essexcoupe3131
    essexcoupe3131 Senior Contributor
    so the 29 and 54-55 didn't sell
    or have an opening price?
    Mike
  • Park_W
    Park_W Senior Contributor
    edited January 2013
    The '29 will go across the block today (Friday), the Italia tomorrow.
This discussion has been closed.