Great Example Of An EBay Ad

[Deleted User]
edited November -1 in HUDSON
I saw this ad and thought that the pictures of all the angles and undercarriage of this car were excellent. A great pictoral representation of a car. Nash's are interesting cars but certainly not my cup of tea. However, I would rent one for the Drive In...



http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Nash-AMBASSADOR-SER-50-1950-NASH-AMC-NOT-HUDSON-KAISER-LAFAYETTE_W0QQitemZ130008376377QQihZ003QQcategoryZ31863QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Comments

  • Interesting car that looks like it was very well done. Unfortunately, not much following and demand for these. Not for me!
  • I know you are going to think I am crazy, but I think that those cars are beautiful. I would love to have one. Then again, I like 1960 Plymouth Valiant station wagons. If everyone hated them, there would be none left, right?

    Bob:D
  • hudsontech
    hudsontech Senior Contributor
    Swasp76063 wrote:
    I know you are going to think I am crazy, but I think that those cars are beautiful. I would love to have one. Then again, I like 1960 Plymouth Valiant station wagons. If everyone hated them, there would be none left, right?



    Bob:D

    They do have a certain styling flair about them - I had a 49 Nash 600 (my Dad made me buy it - but that's another story). Had an awful time getting dates when i had that car - girls dads took one look at it and that was the end of the date!!!! LOL

    Only problem with the style like the 50 - it is a real b*(&ch to change a front tire with those closed in fenders.



    Hudsonly,

    Alex B
  • Hudsy Wudsy
    Hudsy Wudsy Senior Contributor
    "I saw this ad and thought that the pictures of all the angles and undercarriage of this car were excellent."



    I thought the same thing. I'm amazed by how photographing it down low gave the car a broader stance and a more substantial aspect than it really has. I've always thought that '49 - '51 Nashs were rather humble looking. I know these cars fairly well. My older brother used to own Nashs back when we were teens. He loved the fold down seats for drive-ins, etc. Shortly after I bought my second car (and first Hudson - a '52 Hornet sedan) he needed to replace another transmission in one of his Nashs. The junk yard that had one was about an hours drive out of town, so I loaned him my Hornet. He made the trip with one of his buddies who also owned a similar Nash. (Neither of them had ever ridden in a Hudson). When they returned, they were both gushing about the Hudson - it's ride, power and handling. A compliment from my brother was a particularly rare thing at that age. I was beaming.

    There were many things about these under-powered vehicles that I recall disliking, but my most vivid recollection was how they cornered. We lived on a corner, and I can recall getting in the car on the passenger side, his diving about thirty feet to the corner and then turning right. In an instant, the poor Nash would roll around the corner and I'd be thrust way up in the air while it looked like my brother driving it was sitting on the ground. I'm not kidding you, even at the slowest of speeds these cars felt liike they were going to capsize when turning corners. It's never, ever been lost on me that this was the sort of engineering that would, starting in 1955, hold the Hornet engine and carry the name Hudson. Hudson never had a chance to survive that merger.
This discussion has been closed.