Witch oil??
Comments
-
Do you have just Marvel Mystery oil in it, or Marvel with some other oil?0
-
No, There is just a quart of MMO. I don't know what kind of oil is in it.
Thanks, Barry0 -
Barry, I have a 202 with about 58000 on it, never been overhauled. I dropped the pan and it was clean, I have been running 10-40 in it with no problems-0
-
Be careful - I just dropped the oil pan a few weeks ago and it was tar thick with about and inch or more of nasty sludge.... I've only had the car about a year (Nov. 8), and dropping the oil pan is one of the things I should have done the hour it hit my driveway.... It looked like no one had ever dropped the oil pan on this original 232 to clean it out.... I was bummed, but glad I got to it. Has 69K miles. DROP THE PAN AND CLEAN IT OUT!0
-
Thanks, I have been thinking about dropping the pan. I will have too call Dale Cooper and see if I can buy just a pan gasket. What brand of oil do you guys recommend??
Thanks, Barry0 -
At that mileage you need a good multigrade oil detergent oil to keep the engine well lubricated and clean. Don't economise by using the the cheap stuff. This is a pressure fed engine, apart from the tappets and valves. You could even go to a synthetic or semi-synthetic for maximum protection.
Geoff.0 -
What ever you do, don't use witch oil! Pick a brand you like and stick with it. Changing the oil regularly is magic. You don't want spooky things to happen and have your oil pan turn into an unholy brew.
Happy Halloween.0 -
Geoff,
I thought the convention on motor oil for cars of this vintage would be to run non synthetic straight 30 wt. You mention a semi synthetic and full synthetic. Wouldn't that effect the engine gasket's ? I thought that the absorbtion of conventional oil in older engine gaskets was a must. Doesn't the synthetic allow the gaskets to lose the swelling capacity ?0 -
You will get myriad opinions on "witch" is the best oil to use, but it stil l comes down to using the best oil for the job, which is definitely not a straight non-detergent oil. If you want to carry on slidging up your sump and internals, then by all means use it, but modern multi-grade detergent oils give far greater protection, and the Jet motor is pressure fed so there is no question of gravity fed mains or such like. If the engine is not leaking now, it is unlikely that semi or full synthetic oil will induce leaks. I am a "layman" on this subject, but no oil company is going to market a product that either causes sludge to flood through a motor, or induces leaks. Okay, let the shooting start!!!
Geoff.0 -
Witch oil is bad, especially around Halloween, when the witches are demanding their oil. Supply and demand, you know!
Now, as far as "which oil" to use, a good multi-weight is fine if you have just rebuilt your engine. If the engine is still original, or was overhauled years ago, I'd stick with a non-detergent 30W. A synthetic is fine on a newly-overhauled engine. You have people that have their opinions on synthetics themselves, but in a fresh engine, they're fine.0 -
I just use good ol' Valvoline 10-30 out here. Its been a good oil for me. But, everybody will have their own favorite.0
-
Waddaya get when you ask 10 Hudson guys what oil to use? 11 different opinions...0
-
Geoff, I appologize if your think I'm being critical. That was not my intention. On the contrary, I have tremendous respect for your opinions and that's why I asked. I really was looking forward to your answer. Thanks. I also want to say that your one of the reasons that the HET club is so enjoyable to me...... Happy Hudsoning.....0
-
You're all right, everyone has an opinion. Our creator doesn't use a cookie to create us and it's one of the things that makes life interesting. Having said that, I'll stick my neck in the noose of differing ideas and opinions. Syn. oils are made to generate a larger margins of profit. The mineral base oil market is very competitive, so every one looks for a way to make themselves unique. There are only 2 sources for the poly alfa olefin synthesized base used by all who blend a syn. oil or a blend. It costs more money, so not all the blenders want to use it, although you may see a new player get into the syn oil busness as a result of competition converting their customer to thier syn. oil as a result of insulting TV adds. We're convinced that if it's on TV, its gotta be good, or as a result of His buddy's haveing changed and it'll work for him,too.
As most of us motorheads know, oil technology has improved by leaps and bounds since our pride and joys were produced and that to me warrants a little time spent researching what is best to use in the enviroment we live(geograrhically) in. All brands will tell us thiers' is the best. Years ago I stumbled across a manufacturer quietly, with no hype, no brag, no in your face insulting ads,no outrageous statemnets of being the best, that's making a lubricant line that will perform and exceed all of anyones expectations. Website- www.le-inc.com
Now another sore spot is oil additives. October 98 issue of Consumer Report has an article that everyone who has or is using oil additives should pull up and read.
The bottom line is: if it's what they hype it to be,ALL of the folk that make engine oil would be using it. Why should we pay 2 to 3 bucks a quart for a good quality oil and then 5 to 20 bucks for a pint or quart of magic to make it better? Most folk that have used it won't tell ya it didn't work,pride tells em not to.
You'll see in the above mentioned article that everyone of em have been taken to court by FTC, now that's the stuff that can be catergorized as "snake oil".
I'm very greatful for the freedoms we have, I praise the Lord and our men and women who are willing to give thier lives so we can keep it. Don't let the politcally correct crowd, the small radical groups that our government panders to, and the American civil liars union that's managed to steal some of our freedoms,and they aint done yet, take more from us. Did ya know that my 2 children don't say The Pledge Of Allegiance? Nuff said
I thank all for letting me share and not be sensored.
Kim0 -
kamzack wrote:You're all right, everyone has an opinion. Our creator doesn't use a cookie to create us and it's one of the things that makes life interesting. Having said that, I'll stick my neck in the noose of differing ideas and opinions. Syn. oils are made to generate a larger margins of profit. The mineral base oil market is very competitive, so every one looks for a way to make themselves unique. There are only 2 sources for the poly alfa olefin synthesized base used by all who blend a syn. oil or a blend. It costs more money, so not all the blenders want to use it, although you may see a new player get into the syn oil busness as a result of competition converting their customer to thier syn. oil as a result of insulting TV adds. We're convinced that if it's on TV, its gotta be good, or as a result of His buddy's haveing changed and it'll work for him,too.
As most of us motorheads know, oil technology has improved by leaps and bounds since our pride and joys were produced and that to me warrants a little time spent researching what is best to use in the enviroment we live(geograrhically) in. All brands will tell us thiers' is the best. Years ago I stumbled across a manufacturer quietly, with no hype, no brag, no in your face insulting ads,no outrageous statemnets of being the best, that's making a lubricant line that will perform and exceed all of anyones expectations. Website- www.le-inc.com
Now another sore spot is oil additives. October 98 issue of Consumer Report has an article that everyone who has or is using oil additives should pull up and read.
The bottom line is: if it's what they hype it to be,ALL of the folk that make engine oil would be using it. Why should we pay 2 to 3 bucks a quart for a good quality oil and then 5 to 20 bucks for a pint or quart of magic to make it better? Most folk that have used it won't tell ya it didn't work,pride tells em not to.
You'll see in the above mentioned article that everyone of em have been taken to court by FTC, now that's the stuff that can be catergorized as "snake oil".
I'm very greatful for the freedoms we have, I praise the Lord and our men and women who are willing to give thier lives so we can keep it. Don't let the politcally correct crowd, the small radical groups that our government panders to, and the American civil liars union that's managed to steal some of our freedoms,and they aint done yet, take more from us. Did ya know that my 2 children don't say The Pledge Of Allegiance? Nuff said
I thank all for letting me share and not be sensored.
Kim
Well said, Kim - excellent post.0 -
harry54 wrote:Geoff, I appologize if your think I'm being critical. That was not my intention. On the contrary, I have tremendous respect for your opinions and that's why I asked. I really was looking forward to your answer. Thanks. I also want to say that your one of the reasons that the HET club is so enjoyable to me...... Happy Hudsoning.....
Harry, please rest assured that was not implying that you were being critical, and no apology necessary. I appreciate your thoughts, and I should couch my words in a less confrontational manner. It's just such a contentious topic, that I recognize that there will be myriad opinions on the matter! Best wishes,
Geoff.0 -
Being that you already have added Marvel Mystrey oil to your engine. You have in effect already added a high detergent oil to your system which more than likely already has had a cleansing effect . Plus when Geoff gives an opinion it is coming from someone who drives these cars every day and knows them. Not someone who read it in a book.0
-
I heard that a "detergent" oil does not actually clean, like soap, but instead keeps the foreign particles in suspension so that they can stay in the oil long enough to be removed by the flow-through filter. If that is true, then putting detergent oil in an old caked-up engine would not be hazardous.
Those who have taken apart an old Hudson or other engine that was run on non-detergent oils and without a filter, and was not properly maintained, (i.e. very frequent oil changes by today's standards) have seen an inch or more of mayonnaise-like sludge at the bottom of the sump.
That is supposed to be the result of non-detergent oils...the junk settles out of the oil and sinks to the bottom because the oil cannot keep it in suspension.
With the advent of pressure-lubricated engines, flow-though oil filters became feasable, so the oil was re-fourmulated to keep the particles in suspension long enough so that when it passed thru the filter, the junk was filtered out.
I say this because I have seen many modern engines that suffered from infrequent oil changes. I remember one 1962 Ford with a 292 V-8 in particular whose owner bragged to me that he changed the oil every other year "whether it needed it or not". The interior of his engine when we took the valve cover off was caked with gunk, yet it had never seen anything but detergent oil.
And, there was no mayonnaise sludge in the pan.
If the folklore was true, the detergent oils would have cleansed that junk when he had his bi-annual oil changes, but apparently it did not.
Does anyone have any facts about the true nature of the detergents in oil? I am curious.0 -
Detergent oil can only do so much. Changing your oil that infrequently will lead to the gunk you saw. These oils are manufactured to stay alive for about 5 thousand miles tops. After that the active ingredients in the oil are dead. I change the oil in my Hudson at the beginning and end of season and I only drive it about 1000 clicks a year now. When I dropped the pan last year to put in a new pan gasket the inside of the engine was pristine. The bottom of the pan was clean.
Detergent oils work great if you change the oil at proper intervals. If not they will break down and stop doing their job.0 -
Yes, detergent oils do wear out, but how exactly do they function before the detergent component becomes worn out? Do they clean, like a soap, or do they keep waste material in suspension?0
-
From the oil companies information they do many things they coat engine components and keep sludge from building up they break down carbon deposits and yes keep the particles in suspension to be caught by the filter. If you change your oil at regular intervals the deposits will not form in your engine and should stay clean. My splasher buddies change their oil every 1000 miles and change it before storage. I helped change gaskets on one and the engine was clean inside as well. So moral of the story is no matter what you use change it regularly. Which is like duh.....we all do that right?.............0
-
I'm gonna stick my neck in the noose once more. I believe that most consumers don't understand base stocks for oils. Most all the brands buy from low bidder that just barely pass the API specs. Most of the oil companies are in the lube business as result of haveing taken the cash cow off the top and what's left over is used to blend oils and greases. Most of the brands basestock comes from a highly carbon inhibited base, such as Pennsylvania crudes, and is also coal country hence high carbon. Now, foriegn born crudes are much the same way, that being Suadi and South American crudes. A blender is only gonna clean up and use thier unique additive package enough to, again, pass API specs.
The thick material that forms in the sump and valve covers on ohvs' is that emulsified carbon. You'll also see this in ring groves,burnt carbon, not from fuel. Another item that helps to create this thick material, is oil seperating and that part dropping out. So the part of the oil that drops out combined with carbon coats and builds up in the sump and most flat areas. I'm sure you've heard of someone that found an old vehicle with low miles, everything looking good, pull the dipstick and wow, the oil is clean. Not so, seperation has occurred and likely submerged the pickup and a short distance after startup a rattle has begun. The common brands separate if it sits for very long.
The issue of oil turning dark is more the result of heat, exhaust blowby and raw fuel contamination. Only 5 to 7% is dirt.
Quality Detergent oils should carry contamintents in suspension until passing through a filtering system. The detergent combined with the other additives clean and emulsify the buildup inside of an old engine. I've heard guys say that detergent oils should not be used until rebuild,casue it'll break loose chunks and lodge in and plug oiling orfices. not true. Remember, we're in 21st century of oils. One of the drawbacks is, our engines' filtering system is not full flow, but partial flow.
Another item to consider is, straight or multi-viscosity. When our cars were produced, multi-vis technology was in its' infancy. It's come a long way since then and I'm convinced our engines can benefit from the multi-vis oils, rebuilt or not. It's easier on moving parts, bearings and such to cold start at a 10 or 15W, than having to start at a straight 30 or 40 wieght. It's harder on everthing.
Al this to say, my vote is for multi-viscosity, detergent oils with oem drain intervals,3 to5k or beginning of season and end, unless you live where winters are mild and ya get to drive your cars year round.(lucky dogs)
In my last post I meant to say my kids don't recite the Pledge in school, sad isn't it?
Once again, thanks for letting me share,
Kim0 -
Well spoken Kim. Getting back to the original subject of the Hudson Jet motor which (witch?) was referred to, these have neoprene seals front and rear, and should not be prone to leaking unless the gaskets are damaged. They originally used very good quality gaskets in the engine plates, tappet covers, timing case and oil sump. It was certainly an excellent motor, just a pity it wasn't at least o.h.v. to meet the demands of the market. The oil filter used (if fitted) was as mentioned a by-pass, so only a small proportion of the lubricant actually goes through the filter, so oil change around 2,000 miles is recommended. This can be expensive if using synthetic oils, so a good quality medium priced 20W-50 oil should do the job fine. Personally, I have used Castrol GTX in all my cars for the last twenty years, with no problems. Before that I used re-refined oil, which in certain qualities is better than "new" oil, in that you get less ash deposit on pistons and valves. However, this became "uneconomic" to collect and distribute, so is now either dumped or poured on dusty country roads. In actual fact it came about because the hyper-markets and hardware chains got into the packaged oil business. Go figure!
Geoff.0 -
whew!! Thanks Guys, I think I have an Idea of what to do now. First thing is to check my spelling next time!
Thanks, Barry Smedley0 -
I would recommend Shell Rotella T for old engines, it contains Zinc.
I would use 20W 50. multi viscosty oil in theory is suppose to start at the lower and increase in viscosty as the engine heats up and the viscosty
enhancers expand to increase to higher viscosty.
Synthetic oil is made of olifins which is a petroleum based.
I would recommed it only in new engines.
Will0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- 37K All Categories
- 106 Hudson 1916 - 1929
- 19 Upcoming Events
- 91 Essex Super 6
- 28.6K HUDSON
- 561 "How To" - Skills, mechanical and other wise
- 993 Street Rods
- 150 American Motors
- 174 The Flathead Forum
- 49 Manuals, etc,.
- 78 Hudson 8
- 44 FORUM - Instructions and Tips on using the forum
- 2.8K CLASSIFIEDS
- 602 Vehicles
- 2.1K Parts & Pieces
- 77 Literature & Memorabilia
- Hudson 1916 - 1929 Yahoo Groups Archived Photos