Jet-o-let
53 Super Jet with 1994 Chevrolet Vortec 4.3L (262 cu in) V6 "W" motor w/"Z" heads, AC, cruise control, 700R4 tranny, front disc brakes, traction bars.
http://hetclub.com/terry/
NICE ride, Terry
http://hetclub.com/terry/
NICE ride, Terry
0
Comments
-
Might handle driving that one. Definitely a sleeper, that's for sure.0
-
For a Jet...I like it!0
-
Well you certainly got the name right Jetolet. Thats very British of you. In England they do alot of engine swaps in motorcycles and combine the names to refer to them. Like a Triumph engine in a Norton frame is called a Triton and BSA engine in a Norton frame is called a Norbsa.0
-
Sounds like a Port O Let. I had to read it again.. A BIG difference! Nice ride
Grinnnnn. Dave w.0 -
This car had been posted before...I'm still trying to wrap my brain around the disc brake conversion. It looks like the caliper is held on the car with a U bolt. Wouldn't there be a good chance of the caliper mount twisting and making the brake drag? Am I missing something?0
-
Now that's what I call a great "modified"...still retains most of the Hudson character (weirdness?), and a feat of engineering rather than a coupla days with a Sawzall and some bubble gum...0
-
royer wrote:This car had been posted before...I'm still trying to wrap my brain around the disc brake conversion. It looks like the caliper is held on the car with a U bolt. Wouldn't there be a good chance of the caliper mount twisting and making the brake drag? Am I missing something?
I took a double-look, cross-eyed...there is more holding the caliper because the backing plate is L-shaped with the welded pieces but - I'd still like to see it first...I can't imagine the rotational force on the spindle body it wasn't designed for...but then maybe the welded backing plate transfers the force adequetly?
What do you think is rubing off the lower control arm ?0 -
my bet is its the brake disc that rubs on the arm there. although it is at a rather acute angle to the arm.... if it was me doing this conversion i would of fabricated a plate that distributed the forces from the caliper more evenly throughout the length of the spindle. the force would be trying to bend the spindle into a ">" shape (sorry i dont have paint or photoshop) the caliper is pushing into the spindle there. but i have no complaint about hudson drum brakes so i would of left it....0
-
Thanks Dan, I didn't notice the L shape of the backing plate.
I do agree with HalfBaked's assessment of the spindle eventually bending into the shape of a ">"
I'm a big fan of disc brakes, but I'm afraid this setup might not be as reliable as the original drums.
Do the stepdown disc conversions use the same type of setup for the mounting of the caliper?
Thanks again Dan and half baked,
Matt0 -
gas mileage is 28 mi/gal (CITY)0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- 37K All Categories
- 106 Hudson 1916 - 1929
- 19 Upcoming Events
- 91 Essex Super 6
- 28.6K HUDSON
- 561 "How To" - Skills, mechanical and other wise
- 994 Street Rods
- 150 American Motors
- 174 The Flathead Forum
- 49 Manuals, etc,.
- 78 Hudson 8
- 44 FORUM - Instructions and Tips on using the forum
- 2.8K CLASSIFIEDS
- 602 Vehicles
- 2.1K Parts & Pieces
- 77 Literature & Memorabilia
- Hudson 1916 - 1929 Yahoo Groups Archived Photos