Found this interesting....

Unknown
edited November -1 in HUDSON
Check it out. Good read, not necessarily Hudson related, but sorta AMC related...



AMC paper

Comments

  • "AMC, A Heritage of Crap" would be a more apropos title.
  • Dave53-7C wrote:
    "AMC, A Heritage of Crap" would be a more apropos title.

    Which AMC cars did you own?
  • hudsontech
    hudsontech Senior Contributor
    Dave53-7C wrote:
    "AMC, A Heritage of Crap" would be a more apropos title.



    Welllllll, don't think I can agree with that assessment - and I DID drive Ramblers for years.



    I won't go into the details here - I've posted my love affair with the cars many times over the years. I will say I had a hard time killing the ones I drove - and I put anywhere from 150,000 to over 200,000 on them.



    I will say this, tho - to be honest. The ones I drove all had the 232 seven main six engine and I consider that to be one of the better 6 cylinder engines produced. Right up there with, if not better than, Chevy's stovebolt six in the early years and most of the slant-6 Dodge engines.



    They did suffer badly in northern climes - the salt ate them alive, which is why most of mine went to the scrap yard after I got done beatting on them for 3, 4, 5 years on each one.



    As much as I love Hudsons my 2nd choice of the car to own would be the 64-69 Rambler American wagons. And it would be a tough choice.



    Hudsonly,

    Alex Burr

    HudsonTech

    Memphis, TN
  • Many different models while in school. They ranged from late 50's models to those of the late 60's, All purchased from friends, neighbors and relatives unloading them. Although AMC cars were serviceable, all were cheap junk compared to those from the big three. How about you?
  • Alex, you are as welcome to your opinion as I am to mine. My experiences with AMC cars were generally not good. Good to hear that you had better luck with AMC cars.
  • Dave53-7C wrote:
    Many different models while in school. They ranged from late 50's models to those of the late 60's, All purchased from friends, neighbors and relatives unloading them. Although AMC cars were serviceable, all were cheap junk compared to those from the big three. How about you?

    None, AMC was purchased by Chrysler the same year I turned 16. But I did grow up riding around in Gremlins, Rebels, Pacers and Ambassadors and the reliability of those cars were excellent, and my ancestors were known to be HARD on cars.

    The AMC's I had experience with were built while Roy Chapin, Jr was in charge, you must've been driving those Romney Ramblers LOL.
  • Man, I think the best car I EVER had was that ole '65 Rambler Ambassador tudor with the three speed and overdrive. I'm not kidding you, when I first got it I was always hitting the starter at a stop light with the engine running. You absolutely could not hear or feel that V-8 turning.

    Alas, I'd probably still have it if my college roommate hadn't "borrowed" it, ran it across the country on a dope run and ran it totally out of oil.:mad:
  • Hudson Grandpa
    Hudson Grandpa Expert Adviser
    After owning a 1957 Hudson Hornet Hollywood, we decided to get better gas mileage and went to a 1961 Rambler Wagon. great engine nice car. No problems..Wanted a little more Horsepower and luxury so traded it in for a 1965 Rambler Classic Hardtop. Straight six, leather seats, Air, Power steering. Unfortunately I sold it in 1985. Ran like a top and had 150,000 on the odometer. It's all in how you treat the car. All my cars were 5's when I sold them. At that time one of the best reliable 6's available.
  • hudsn47
    hudsn47 Senior Contributor
    I bought a 1962 Rambler Classic in 1977 on my 18th b'day with money my mother gave me for cloths. Push button auto and fold down seats. Best thing was the seats. Even Bought one later that was the same model and year. My girlfriend, now wife, and I drove matching Ramblers. Dad had a 47 C8 in the garage at the time and I didn't even know they were related! Now we still have the 47 and wish we still had a Ramber (for the seats!) The Rambler was seriously underpowered but that probalby was a blessing for a 18 yr old cruising in 77.
  • royer wrote:
    None, AMC was purchased by Chrysler the same year I turned 16. But I did grow up riding around in Gremlins, Rebels, Pacers and Ambassadors and the reliability of those cars were excellent, and my ancestors were known to be HARD on cars.



    The AMC's I had experience with were built while Roy Chapin, Jr was in charge, you must've been driving those Romney Ramblers LOL.



    So true Matt, those Romney Ramblers (Romblers) were sad. While I was in school, one friend had a Gremlin and another a Pacer. Again, in my opinion, those cars were of lesser quality than most. However, they sure did get around and nobody ever thought of stealing them, even if you left the keys in them. :D
  • 37 CTS
    37 CTS Senior Contributor
    An interesting paper re: AMC

    In my family I was the third generation to sell AMC cars

    I made a good living selling 100s of Gremlin, Hornets and Pacers and Jeeps.

    During '73 to '78 I had many new demos and all good cars, no problems and enjoyable to drive. Also owned 74 Gremlin and 80 Concord.
  • hudsontech
    hudsontech Senior Contributor
    Dave53-7C wrote:
    Alex, you are as welcome to your opinion as I am to mine. My experiences with AMC cars were generally not good. Good to hear that you had better luck with AMC cars.



    You know Dave, I'm glad you posted your rejoinder - because you, perhaps inadvertantly, pointed out one fact about AMC cars. Unlike other makes, you either loved or hated AMC built cars. No in between.



    I think the problem, especially in the 60's, was AMC designed a mid-range car (the Classic). Then they upscaled it into the Ambassador. Nice car, reasonably comfortable, but not really all that well done. The Classic had problems of its own. AMC also down-scaled the Classic into the American. And those had fewer problems and were darn near bullet proof. Those were the ones I have experience with.



    Hudsonly,

    Alex Burr
  • Alex,



    Let me say this, I never met an AMC product that I liked. Perhaps others who exclusively owned AMC products had no basis for comparison. I, having owned and/or driven cars from all American manufacturers, however, did. As I remember, a Classic I had was a base model with the Ambassador of the same year being essentially the same car, albeit a pig with lipstick. In my opinion, AMC cars were cheap, ugly and poorly made, but, as you say, darn near bullet-proof.
  • I remember a interesting story that my father told me once about the time he worked for AMC at the Kenosha plant while he was stationed at Great Lakes. It was a part-time job, of course. The job paid minimum wage, but would bonus you for piece work above so many units.

    He trained on the tailgate production unit for the Rambler, using a blue-print drawing that the engineer had detailed; he was required to spot-weld 48 locations on the tailgate unit. My father, dutifully spot-welded every unit as shown, always completing the required base amount of tailgates. But, it seemed he never could get fast enough to get into the piece work bonus money.

    This was especially disturbing, as the guy next to him was turning out two or three to his one. Finally, my father asked the guy next to him to watch him put a tailgate together and see if he could give him some pointers or tips to speed his work.

    After watching my father do a couple of units, the guy spoke up “Your putting too many spots welds in.” My father pointed to blue-print and said “I am getting every one shown”. The guy said “right, but I only do about a dozen”. My dad said, “What about the Inspector”? The man replied “Well if he sends one back throw a couple more in and send it along”.

    After that, my father said he cut down the spot welds to about 24 and never got a reject, while the guy next to him was only spot welding about 12-14 and only got rejections when he went below that number.

    So, I would assume that your “poorly made statement” is somewhat founded.
  • Owned one Hash ('56 Super Wasp), one Rambler ('59 Classic) and one AMC Jeep ('87 Cherokee) - the Jeep had 250K miles on it and that is what I traded, straight-up(!) for that '56 Wasp. The Rambler was a slug (flat 6 and 3-spd, no OD), and the Wasp, other than a leaky radiator) was the niceset Hudson I've owned, next to my '37 TP. The Jeep ran great, and the guy I traded with couldn't move it off his lot in ND. I hauled the Jeep up to him and hauled the Hash home.



    So, good AMC cars: 2; bad: 1.
  • admin wrote:
    I remember a interesting story that my father told me once about the time he worked for AMC at the Kenosha plant while he was stationed at Great Lakes. It was a part-time job, of course. The job paid minimum wage, but would bonus you for piece work above so many units.



    He trained on the tailgate production unit for the Rambler, using a blue-print drawing that the engineer had detailed; he was required to spot-weld 48 locations on the tailgate unit. My father, dutifully spot-welded every unit as shown, always completing the required base amount of tailgates. But, it seemed he never could get fast enough to get into the piece work bonus money.



    This was especially disturbing, as the guy next to him was turning out two or three to his one. Finally, my father asked the guy next to him to watch him put a tailgate together and see if he could give him some pointers or tips to speed his work.



    After watching my father do a couple of units, the guy spoke up “Your putting too many spots welds in.” My father pointed to blue-print and said “I am getting every one shown”. The guy said “right, but I only do about a dozen”. My dad said, “What about the Inspector”? The man replied “Well if he sends one back throw a couple more in and send it along”.



    After that, my father said he cut down the spot welds to about 24 and never got a reject, while the guy next to him was only spot welding about 12-14 and only got rejections when he went below that number.



    So, I would assume that your “poorly made statement” is somewhat founded.



    More like well founded, as in Packard's slogan, "Ask the man who owns one." No wonder the bodies kept falling apart on AMC cars. If we can find people who worked on the other lines, maybe they could explain the various nuts, bolts and washers often found floating around in AMC oil pans. Obviously, your father was too good of an employee.
  • Huddy42
    Huddy42 Senior Contributor
    G'Day from Down Under, Had quite a few Ramblers in my time, 1958 Super Sedan,1965 Rambler Classic Wagon, 1975 Rambler Hornet, (Loved the Hornet) and currently own a 1965 Rambler Classic ,as well as our 1942 Two Door Brougham, never had any serious problems with any of them.
  • No wonder I was able to buy AMC cars for next to nothing back in the day, I must have stumbled on the source of every one that had problems. :(
This discussion has been closed.