float level

tigermoth
tigermoth Expert Adviser
edited November -1 in HUDSON
hello, i posted a note about my '35 stalling and had several good replies. one of which referenced changing the original float level from the original 3/8" by 1/8". i assume i raise the float level by 1/8", not raise the float measurement (there by lowering the fuel/float level) by 1/8" is that correct or do i have it backward? thank you. regards, tom

Comments

  • Uncle Josh
    Uncle Josh Senior Contributor
    As long as the float is closer to the road, or touches the fuel sooner.
  • tigermoth
    tigermoth Expert Adviser
    so i did have it backward. modern fuels require the fuel to sit lower in the float bowl. (increasing the measurement for setting the float bowl) ok, i will adjust. thank you. uncle josh. regards, tom
  • Geoff
    Geoff Senior Contributor
    The problem arises because the float level setting is done by a fixed measurement between the seam of the float, and the raised section of the float bowl, and measuring the distance thereof. This takes no account of the different specific gravity of modern fuel compared to the fuel that was used in 1935. The old gasoline was "denser", therefore it raised the float sooner, and cut the supply off, which allowed a specific amount to be drawn trhough the jets. With modern fuel, the lighter fuel doesn't raise the float as quickly, hence the actual level in the bowl is higher, and because the fuel is "thinner" it allows much more to be drawn through the jets, and flooding and rich running results. This applies to modern unleaded gasoline. However, I don't know what is going to be the result now that bio-fuels are coming in. I understand that these are even more prone to vapor-locking, but I don't know what the specific gravity will be.

    Geoff.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

In this Discussion