232 Head Thickness on a 262

hudsonguy
hudsonguy Senior Contributor
edited November -1 in HUDSON
Thinking about putting a 232 head on my 262, to bump up the performance, mileage, etc. I know that the stock head thickness is 2.00". Just wondering what is the thinnest head thickness one can safely use without overstressing the bottom end of the motor. I've got one that looks to have had .025-.030 removed from it previously. Seems like I read one can remove up to .060 safely, but wanted to make sure.



Thanks for the help.

Comments

  • hudsonguy
    hudsonguy Senior Contributor
    As far as I can tell, by putting a 232 head on my 268 (262 bored .040 over), I'll raise the compression ratio a full point. From 6.7:1 to 7.7:1, which is even more than the 7.2:1 from an aluminum head. Actually, it would be even more than that, because the 232 head I've got would have to have at least .050 total shaved off of it, which would raise it even more. Maybe I'm setting myself up for future problems if I raise this up into the 8:1 area????



    On a side note, I bought a new FelPro gasket from Russ Maas at the Nats. He didn't have any Best brand gaskets to fit a narrow block 262, which is what I've got. The FelPro is a sandwich style (metal/fibre/metal). Have you used this one before?



    I'd appreciate any and all opinions or suggestions on whether I should do this, or just leave well enough alone.



    Thanks for the help
  • hudsonguy
    hudsonguy Senior Contributor
    Actually, there is SOME block relief on my '49 block. My original '49 block didn't have any at all, but that engine has been replaced by one that was produced toward the end of the '49 year that I picked up. It's got large circular cuts, whose axis is angled about parallel with the valve stems, right in between the bore and it's two valve openings. It's not on par with a full 7X relief, but it sure looks like it must increase the flow a lot more than my original block. I also smoothed off and polished all the sharp corners left between the machined cuts when I rebuilt the engine.



    Coincidentally, the failure of my original block was a crack that developed between the #6 intake valve and bore. I believe this was a problem that had been addressed by Hudson by the end of that year with the above 'fix'.



    Were you able to find a Best gasket to fit your narrow block 262, or had you switched over to the 308 by then?



    Oh yeah, I'm aware of the block differences. That's why I had to find a '50 Pacemaker head for a 232 that would fit my block width.



    I should probably leave well enough alone since it's running great these days, but working on the Hudson is almost as much fun as driving it, and I've got just about everything else 'done'. Plus, it would be nice to up the mileage a little. I'll decide next winter....for now I'm just driving it as much as I can.
This discussion has been closed.