are we turning into the "stepdown" club?
Comments
-
Walt lets see some pics of your '34!0
-
50C8DAN wrote:Walt lets see some pics of your '34!0
-
walt's garage-53 wrote:Walt here. I chose the 53 Hornet because I wanted a car to travel across this country. I love the old Hudson's but the motors would not drive across this country like I do with my 53. Try putting 175,100 miles on them in 11 years without touching anything and drive on super highways with traffic in the 75 to 90 range. I built a 1951 Hudson 8 engine to shoe horn into a 1934 8 with the 3 speed with overdrive and installed a Ford rear with 3:50 gears, along with air condition. In the next few weeks we will add cruise control. Forgot, we installed Hornet front brakes because at 70 mph the front brakes and the rear brakes on cable would no stop this car. It is now a driver. Walt.
I remember Eddie Moore telling about a 34 coupe that his dad, Don Moore, put a 308 in. Eddie said the 34 would do everything except stop!!!
I know full well if I should ever build another 37, 38, 39 Dodge or Plymouth coupe with the 53 Dodge 241 hemi in it, I would, without doubt, put disk brakes in - at least in the front. Those old 30's cars, with big engines in them, had about as much stopping power as a freight train.
Hudsonly,
Alex Burr
Memphis, TN0 -
walt's garage-53 wrote:Walt here. I chose the 53 Hornet because I wanted a car to travel across this country. I love the old Hudson's but the motors would not drive across this country like I do with my 53. Try putting 175,100 miles on them in 11 years without touching anything and drive on super highways with traffic in the 75 to 90 range. I built a 1951 Hudson 8 engine to shoe horn into a 1934 8 with the 3 speed with overdrive and installed a Ford rear with 3:50 gears, along with air condition. In the next few weeks we will add cruise control. Forgot, we installed Hornet front brakes because at 70 mph the front brakes and the rear brakes on cable would no stop this car. It is now a driver. Walt.
Sounds like my setup, Been using it for 5 years now and it sure makes it more driveable, but why the Ford rear? Mine is a dana 44 from a 52/54. What kind of wheels you using?, I used Motor wheels from Chrysler products so I still have wire wheels.0 -
IMHO, any of the cars from '37 on up handle well and can be driven at speeds of 55-60, or better if equipped with OD or more favorable rear axle ratios. Whether the Interstates or the non-expressway roads are better may depend on how nervous one is about seeing someone pull up to a stop at an upcoming intersection. On my first outing with our former '36 convertible, I thought I'd take a state hwy to the meet 20 miles away, but soon got so worried about intersections, folks pulling out from their driveway, traffic light timing, etc., I headed quickly out on the limited-access highway. Felt much safer there, even at 55 while the mad Atlanta-area traffic whizzed past me. I love the performance and handling of our Hornet, but I plan to always have one pre-stepdown Hudson to drive. Folks need to see what great cars they were.0
-
tombia wrote:Sounds like my setup, Been using it for 5 years now and it sure makes it more driveable, but why the Ford rear? Mine is a dana 44 from a 52/54. What kind of wheels you using?, I used Motor wheels from Chrysler products so I still have wire wheels.0
-
50C8DAN wrote:Walt lets see some pics of your '34!0
-
I wonder what percentage of Hudsons dissappeared in the World War II scrap drives? Particularly those from the 1920's and earlier.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- 37K All Categories
- 106 Hudson 1916 - 1929
- 19 Upcoming Events
- 91 Essex Super 6
- 28.6K HUDSON
- 561 "How To" - Skills, mechanical and other wise
- 993 Street Rods
- 150 American Motors
- 174 The Flathead Forum
- 49 Manuals, etc,.
- 78 Hudson 8
- 44 FORUM - Instructions and Tips on using the forum
- 2.8K CLASSIFIEDS
- 600 Vehicles
- 2.1K Parts & Pieces
- 77 Literature & Memorabilia
- Hudson 1916 - 1929 Yahoo Groups Archived Photos